This essay presents a case against being a pure consequentialist. Being a pure consequentialist is implausible because it is either an inconsistent position, or it implies an implausibly dogmatic stance toward pure consequentialism itself. Moreover, the case against being a pure consequentialist finds added support from consequentialist considerations, suggesting that we can also create better outcomes by not being pure consequentialists.
- ISBN:
- 9798227972149
- 9798227972149
-
Category:
- Ethics & moral philosophy
- Publication Date:
-
02-10-2024
- Language:
- English
- Publisher:
- Magnus Vinding
This item is delivered digitally
Hi There,
Did you know that you can save books into your library to create gift lists, reading lists, etc?
You can also mark books that you're reading, or want to read.
Great!
Click on Save to My Library / Lists
Select the List you'd like to categorise as, or add your own
Here you can mark if you have read this book, reading it or want to read
Awesome! You added your first item into your Library
Great! The fun begins.
Click on My Library / My Lists and I will take you there
Reviews
Be the first to review A Gödelesque argument against being a pure consequentialist.
Share This eBook: